In the Inferno, Virgil gives Dante a tour of hell. But first he shows him the poor souls who are not even fit to enter Satan's abode. Cowards all, these are they who refused to take a principled stand during moral crisis, including the angels who waited until Satan's rebellion was over, wishing to take the side, not of good, but of the winner. Lacking the fortitude to march under any banner in life, the souls not fit for hell chase a banner in perpetuity, suffering endless torment in a stroke of masterful irony.
Clearly then, it is important for man to have a cause. It is also important that the cause is a just one. Satan and his minions did take a stand, and in doing so did merit themselves at least an eternal resting place in hell. Yet this consolation prize, if it could be called that, is not very comforting. The rest of the Divine Comedy concerns a variety of causes, at least at some level. We journey with Dante and Virgil through the circles of hell, then through purgatory and lastly, and gloriously, behold with him the beatific vision. But here we must leave Dante, for I wish to speak on causes.
I checked out of work a bit early on Friday. I have no qualms with putting in my eight hours, but I quite literally had no work to do. One can only surf the internet so long, and it makes little difference whether I am in my cube or driving home, if I'm not going to be doing any actual work. Such is the life of an engineering intern.
Having sufficiently meandered along my usual route by frequenting my favorite sites, I decided to head to Amazon to search for additions to my not completely unimpressive personal library. It could be noted that I am currently ensconced in no less than five books, and more reading material is the last thing I need, but books hold a great deal of power over me. I shilly-shallied around Amazon's wondrous store for awhile, but ultimately refrained from making any purchases because of the ever-present
When work finished, or rather, when I left, I headed to Half-Priced Books in the hopes of adding to my collection without making too great a dent in my proverbial pocketbook. I made some marvelous acquisitions, but before I had even got to the store, I observed something interesting.
It was Good Friday, and a procession of sorts was going on outside the abortion mill, err clinic, on
It should go without saying that the pro-life crowd was behaving in a peaceful manner. Anti-abortion zealots who bomb abortion clinics or murder "doctors" who perform abortions are outliers, thankfully.
It does go without saying that those marching under the banner of promoting the protection of innocent human life are serving a worthy cause indeed. The efficacy of a humble protest is still up for debate, but one cannot be faulted for not feeding the hungry when the hungry are also dead. I do not have the solution to the abortion riddle. The Republicans could very well be headed for near-hell themselves, as they continue to plead no contest to a holocaust that has claimed more than forty million victims. At least the marchers are trying.
Near the pro-life contingent was a much smaller group of abortion proponents. I was immediately struck by the contrast in the two groups. The Catholics parade slowly and solemnly, saddened by a world which 2000 years ago crucified Christ and today butchers babies. In the name of choice, and so the child will not have to suffer to live in a world not overflowing with material possessions, his or her life is discarded. As the High Priest once argued, it is better for one man to die than that a people perish.
The pro-abortion crowd was decidedly less somber. They were actually smiling, holding signs of purported solidarity with the women of
Hypocrites encompass all ideologies. That abortion supporters are less than consistent is true, but it is beside the point. It is also, almost, irrelevant that there is no rational reason to allow for abortion save the faulty philosophical system known as utilitarianism. In any case, this has been covered to death, here, and more especially elsewhere.
I do wonder though, why someone would choose the cause of abortion to march under. Even those who accept abortion as a form of birth control tend to do so almost out of embarrassment. Yes, they say, we should avoid aborting, but there are times when it is necessary. Murder is never necessary, and this stance reeks of moral indifference. Yet this lack of fortitude does bring with it a certain honesty about the situation. No honest person likes to campaign for abortion. Even the most committed heathen reaches a moment where the stench of blood becomes too much. Even the most inhuman of humans does have a pinch of humanity somewhere deep within.
I half contemplated speaking with one of the young women holding a sign. Perhaps I should have, but I do not regret not doing so. Abortionists are not easily dissuaded from the true faith. Facts are discarded, as the clump of cells is disposable and as any fool knows, pro-lifers only believe abortion is wrong because God tells us so. The stubbornness of a feminist gone mad is enough to make a young earth creationist blush.
If Christ is truly the Son of God, if he truly came to earth to suffer and die for us, we will one day have to account for our actions. I cannot help but wonder what on earth the abortion crowd will have to say to the Lord of the universe. I do know, however, what the Good Lord will say to them: "Depart from me ye accursed, for I know ye not!" They will be cast into hell, where there is wailing and grinding of teeth.
Christ did die for mankind, but the Resurrection is not an all expenses trip paid to heaven. It is our choice whether we accept his gift, or continue to drive the nails into his hands by the causes we choose to fight for and against. Choose well.
Monday, April 17, 2006
Causes
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
As I am discussing over at my blog, I believe the pro-abortion people believe they are defending a "right", their right to choose.This, they feel, is an aspect of liberty, and you might engage it on this level rather than the moral.They would like to know at what point the State may intervene in their own lives. You believe it is immediatly following conception, they ,and the Supreme Court, feel the State must wait until the first tri-mester.
I believe the State has the duty to protect the life of it's citizens, even the ones that are only seconds old, and that this duty extends much further into protecting the general welfare of it's citizens, guaranteeing food, medicine, education, and security through out the entire life.
As for the rape trial, why say anything at all?
I have two problems with "pro-choicers".
1. Very few of them are intellectually honest. I have yet to hear a credible retort to why brain waves and a beating heart are important.
2. Many of them do not treat the issue with proper solemnity it deserves. Even if it's only a fetus, an abortion is not something to be undertaken lightly. It's a surgical procedure; it's not akin to changing a light bulb.
As for the rape trial, I comment because there seems to have been a far too hasty rush to judgment. The truth is being over-looked in the media's attempt to hang these boys. If guilty, they should hang, but we cannot operate on the presumption that a charge of rape always means a rape takes place.
We could deal with a bit more patience and open-mindedness-- important things, no?
I guess I don't sense the media bias and see a process proceeding exactly as it should.
As for your census on the intellectually honest,or the exact quantity of those who treat the issue with proper solemnity, do you feel you have a reliable survey? Would more honest or solemn pro-choicers affect your tone?
I have argued that "life" is a somewhat broad category,as each cell,protean, molecule, hair, fingernail is technically alive.Pro-choice people argue that viability, the point where the fetus needn't depend on an extra humans support simply to exist is the point where the state has an over-riding interest in protecting it's rights.Prior to that the states interest is subordinate to the rights of the supporter.
The solemnity issue requires others to have the same values or religious beliefs which goes against our secular system of laws.However repulsive, casual abortion cannot be differentited from solemn .
As for your census on the intellectually honest,or the exact quantity of those who treat the issue with proper solemnity, do you feel you have a reliable survey? Would more honest or solemn pro-choicers affect your tone?
Probably not, now that you mention it. I only note that very few pro-choicers have admitted, to me at least, that life starts at some point before birth. The point appears obvious to me, and I don't think one need cling to Judeo-Christian values to see this.
My tone would change if I saw pro-choicers who were genuinely trying to ensure that abortion is rare. I tend to see the issue very black and white though, and in all honesty, pro-choicers don't seem to have a leg to stand on. That said, if they were more tactful, I might be more respectful. Then again, how respectful must we be of those murdering babies?
The solemnity issue requires others to have the same values or religious beliefs which goes against our secular system of laws.However repulsive, casual abortion cannot be differentited from solemn.
Therein lies the rub, and secularism inevitably leads to a world in which nothing is verboten. If you have any ideas for getting Christians to behave as such would you please let me know. Thanks.
Post a Comment