Once omnipresent, the Duke rape story is now nowhere to be found. This could merely be further evidence that the collective American attention span barely surpasses that of the goldfish. Alternatively, the priveleged white boys, once guilty as sin--or the secular equivalent thereof--now appear to be nothing more than victims of calumny, which is almost as shocking as the announcement from the revered tabloid that yet another celebrity marriage fell apart.
The day after the March 13 team party where a 27-year-old black woman claimed she was raped, Durham police told campus officers that "this will blow over," the report said. The woman initially told police she was raped by 20 white men, then said she was attacked by three, the report said.
Being a prospective engineer, I'm tolerably good at math. The number twenty is greater than the number three. We can glean one of several conclusions.
1) The accuser was in an altered state such that she mistook three men for nearly seven times that many. In this case, her testimony is unreliable. If a woman can't distinguish between twenty and three of an object that is, on average, six feet tall and one hundred ninety pounds--note, these numbers are made up; just pretend I work for the New York Times--she cannot be a worthy source of information in determining whether or not she was raped. The DNA tests have thus exonerated the men.
2) The accuser is lying outright. She was never raped, and is, in fact, only conjuring up a story because she can. Even when the men are acquitted, the apologists for this poor woman will see further evidence of privelege trumping the rights of the commoner. Oh the calamity of a jury which clings readily to facts, and uses the obvious lack thereof which coincide with the woman's allegations to return a just verdict.
When honesty is no longer honored, lying becomes permissible. When the reasons to lie are many, and the reasons to tell the truth, few, weak constitutions will find excuse to forgo the path of noblility. Since women who lie about rapes suffer few consequences, and reap the rewards that come with media exposure, women lie about rape, and will continue to do so. This is not to say that rape never happens, of course, but when making up a story lands one a scholarship, well, you do the math.
On a related note, it seems we have another bogus rape claim--great name for a band, by the way.
A 13-year-old girl who told Zion police she was raped by seven boys in an apartment complex laundry room last month has recanted her original statement that she was forced to engage in the sexual activity.
See, abstinence doesn't work. Because, I mean, kids are going to have sex, you know. With multiple partners. In the same day.
We are in a strange stage culturally, where, despite valiant attempts by those opposed to traditional Judeo-Christian values, specifically in regard to the sexual ethic, something innate in people tells them that having gratuitous sex is not something of which to be proud. It is deemed less dishonorable to invent claims of rape than admit that one is, in fact, a dirty tramp or a misguided fool.
I for one will be estatic when we erase all this silly Christian guilt. In twenty years, this girl will be proud of having sex with seven boys, and the bogus claims can all go away. Ah, the sweet smell of cultural demise under the guise of liberation.
Wednesday, May 10, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
10 comments:
How about all those good Christian boys, inviting strippers over to ogle while they guzzle booze and make racist remarks? Sign of the times?
Sure it is. Christianity has become little about rules and regulations of the good life, and instead, a muttered word that Jesus is someone's Lord and Savior.
I could blame Protestantism, but Catholics seem short on dogma, too, or at least adherence to said dogma.
It would appear the information regarding 20 rapists is actually false. The report was based on a Duke security officer overhearing some other officers talking about it. As of this time, no officer has come forward confirming the alleged victim claimed the number of 20, only the number 3. Thought I'd shoot you an update.
I thought you would probably want to see this.
http://www.dukenews.duke.edu/mmedia/pdf/OperationsReportFileDUPD3.14.06.pdf
There's a link to the only report using the number 20. If you read the details of the report, the officer in question, Officer Day, did not actually meet the alleged victim. Ergo, the victim could not have told him she was raped by 20 men. This being the result of an overheard conversation has publicly been announced by the Durham City manager. Here's a quote from Patrick Baker:
“He did not have a conversation with our officer,” Baker said in a telephone interview Tuesday night. “He did not have a conversation with the victim. He prepared his report based on conversations he overheard and the context of that conversation.”
Oh gosh, I'm really sorry. My link didn't paste right. Here's the correct link, I'll let you read it. Thanks!
http://www.dukenews.duke.edu/mmedia/pdf/OperationsReportFileDUPD3.14.06.pdf
Thanks for the correction.
If the allegation of 20 rapists cannot be confirmed, this case returns to its prior status.
I'm still very skeptical that this woman was, in fact, raped. Hopefully justice will be served.
I tend to agree, but I'll have to wait and see if you're right.
Also, haven't you heard: women never lie about rape!
Dear "A wiser man than I" Funny, brief, and straight to the point. That's what I like about men. They really know how to cut through straight to the point. I wish I knew how to do that!
Checkout this argument I had with a bunch of feminist on a feminist blog.
Noname I think it’s pretty safe to say that the stripper wasn’t raped.
Chuckles Maybe Nifong should lead a massive search throughout the east coast of every fake-mustache store if anyone had a customer wearing a Duke Lacrosse uniform.
Ismone The "rape kit" showed evidence of a recent sexual activity. She had sex with her boyfriend before or after the party, which would explain the "evidence".
Ismone In defense of noname, no one wishes anyone to be raped, but if she lied, she deserves to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law on 46 counts for each lacrosse player she lied about.
Ismone “No contrary evidence is presented” This whole case if full of contrary evidence. Why you ignore it is another issue. I suspect the stripper could come right out and say that she made the whole thing up, and you’d stillinsist that she was raped. People like you don’t care about evidence.
A grand jury conviction is not hard to get, all you need is to say I need an indictment.
It is impossible that a crime scene with three drunk men in a small enclosed room with a fighting and clawing woman being orally, virginally, and anally penetrated not leave any DNA evidence of urine, blood, vaginal fluid, seat, fecal matter, scat smears, saliva, tears, or semen... especially if condoms were used. How would they take off the condoms during all this chaos without spilling, smearing, or touching the content inside or outside of the condom?
Ismone You really should think before ranting about things you know nothing about. It makes you look like an idiot.
I'm tired of hearing about "white male privilege. It's female privilege that allows these boys' lives to be destroyed with only the word of a drunken stripper with a long criminal history and a pattern of making false accusations.
"I was raped" is just as good proof as "I was robbed." Again Isome, you expose yourself to be an idiot. You can accuse anybody with what ever you want. It doesn’t mean it’s true. One woman claimed that she felt sexually harassed because a man wore a fanny pack to work. The police refused to charge the man, so she proceeded to sue her workplace in civil court… it was thrown out. Saying “someone robbed me”, like any claim, must be proven in court. Just because someone accuses a crime occurred, doesn’t mean it happened – Deal with it Ismone! Just like in the Duke Rape Scandal. She obviously lied.
These boys are innocent! The drunken black stripper with the long criminal record and history of making false accusations...lied.
• Stripper made a false claim of rape by three boys in 1996.
• Stripper made a false claim of kidnapping in 1998
• Stripper charged with larceny, auto theft, and trying to kill a police officer in 2002
• 1st round of DNA shows no link to the lacrosse team.
• 2nd round of DNA shows no link to the lacrosse team
• DNA proves stripper had sex with boyfriend/pimp which accounts for the “rape kit” evidence of recent sexual activity.
• Innocent boy who picked up finger nail and threw it in the trash left his DNA on the fake press-on nail and will be charged for rape.
The stripper’s account of the night has serious integrity issues:
First she claimed 20 boys raped her, then she narrowed it down to 3 in a bathroom
a. The bathroom is absolutely and completely devoid of any evidence of a rape. Where is her DNA? Urine, blood, vaginal fluid, saliva, or tears?
b. Many people’s DNA were found under her nails but none from the innocent lacrosse boys.
c. She lied about losing her fake finger nails in a desperate struggle in the small enclosed bathroom, but pictures show that she removed her nails before inadequately performing her routine. No scratches were found on any of the innocent lacrosse boys’ bodies.
d. The 2 innocent boys she “eeny meeny miney moed” to be her rapists weren’t even at the party the time she claimed the rape occurred. She claims that she’s 100% sure, but she told her father that she’s not sure.
e. She took drugs before coming to the house, something illegal.
The stripper obviously lied, and she’s putting these innocent boys and families through hell. She deserves to be in prison for the rest of her pathetic life. She is worthless as a person and human being. Her one lie destroyed innocent boys. I hope her and Nifong’s aura catches up to them and they both get what they deserve. I hope everyone wishing this rape claim to be true, in spite of all the evidence that it never occurred, gets what’s coming to them.
Mac Dive’s weak argument DNA proves a crime couldn’t have occurred the was the lying stripper claimed.
Fact DNA wasn’t found under the fingernail, it was found on the top surface of the nail.
Mac Dive’s weak argument • A forensic examination of the victim found evidence consistent with rape.
Fact All the rape kit showed is that the stripper had recent evidence f sexual 1ntercourse, it can’t tell when or if it was consensual, but now we know through conclusive DNA evidence that she had sex with her boyfriend.
Mac Dive’s weak argument • Motive, means and opportunity for the accused to have raped the alleged victim exist.
Fact This is true only if the stripper was in three places at once, at the house with the first guy, at the bank machine with the second guy, and in the dorm room with the third guy.
Mac Dive’s weak argument • Photo identification of the suspects without prompting.
Fact The photo line up was of only the lacrosse team to guarantee only lacrosse team members were chosen. It seams DA Nifong didn’t believe she would pick only lacrosse players either, so he fixed it so she did.
Mac Dive’s weak argument • Linking to DNA from a suspect previously identified with 90 percent accuracy.
Fact She was 90% sure except for the mustache, the third guy never had a mustache, so it makes it 0% sure.
• A pubic hair was found on the alleged victim that may be found to be consistent with the pubic hair of one of the suspects.
Fact The hair in question is not linked to the lacrosse boys, it could be from her boyfriend or previous clients.
Mac Dive’s weak argument If evidence of either high alcohol content or the date rape drug has been found in toxicology exams that too will favor the prosecution.
Fact The stripper is a drug abuser and alcoholic. How would a drunk stripper having multiple sex that night remember who she consented to sex and if sex ever happen? No date rape drugs were found in the innocent boy’s possession. This lie was made up by desperate feminists and lame women who hope the black stripper was raped. The Stripper has a long history of drug abuse, she probably took the illegal drugs herself.
Mac Dive’s weak argument (Kim Roberts says the lacrosse players plied the alleged victim with drink.)
Fact Kim Roberts initially said that a rape never happened. After getting arrested and threatened with jail, she copped a deal with the prosecution to not have her probation revoked, and said a rape did occur, then she contacted a Public Relations firm telling them :”I don’t want to let this opportunity pass me by” “How can I spin this to my advantage”. The she stated in the press, “Why shouldn’t I profit from this scandal? I have a child at home.” Ms. Roberts, like many who claim this rape occurred, is not a reliable source.
Mac Dive’s weak argument Instead of being misled by babbling about the dancers painting their nails in the bathroom, keep your eye on the actual evidence. That is what will matter in the end.
Fact This is the only thing I agree with Ms. Mac Dive. Practice what you preach. Stop babbling and look at the evidence…
By the time the truth comes out, these boys will have their reputations thoroughly trashed, and the poor woman will have a full ride to college. Until we remove the incentive to lie about rape, it will continue to happen.
This one will make your skin crawl:
http://www.townhall.com/opinion/column/kathleenparker/2006/05/10/196884.html
Lawyers are waiting in the shadows for lucrative civil suit
A man stands in the shadows of the Duke Lacrosse 'rape' case…watching and waiting. While the three wealthy, white male students remains in criminal court, he is not likely to step forward.
Even at this early stage, the stripper’s mother is "very much interested" in "getting Willie E. Gary is a litigator renowned for winning huge settlements.
The stripper’s parents met with Gary in April. The meeting was facilitated by civil rights activist Rev. Jesse Jackson.
Gary acts as a family adviser, and the parents are laying groundwork to make a civil bid. Public opinion can be a large bargaining chip in obtaining a lucrative settlement. Earlier, the parents spoke freely; now they’re being more media savvy.
Essence Magazine featured three articles by Kristal Brent Zook. Each is sympathetic to the accuser. (1st) "Family Defends Daughter's Painful Past", (2nd) "Nowhere to Turn," depicts the accuser as living in terror. (3rd) is basically an announcement of Willie Gary's appearance in the case; it concludes by stating that the parents "worry that their daughter may…need additional legal guidance."
Civil law deals in torts or harms inflicted by one person upon another; its purposes are compensation for actual or perceived damages.
A "guilty" verdict in criminal court can be used to establish liability in a civil one but if the verdict is "not guilty" or the charges are dropped, a civil case can proceed independently.
Kobe Bryant settled out-of-court settlement. Such settlements are not necessarily admissions of guilt. After months of media blitz, Bryant may have been embarrassed to settle, so civil suits could be lucrative even if the “accuser’s” claim is completely fabricated. The Duke students will face the same choice?
Civil suits can be lucrative, and they’re easier to win; standards of evidence and other legal protections enjoyed by a defendant are significantly lowered in civil court.
Clearly, her parents wish to explore a civil proceeding. Gary is conspicuously available.
Post a Comment