One problem with the Narrative is that while it keeps the peace, in the short term, by channelling discontent into tired trenches of something that occasionally resembles thought, on the whole, it tends to make us dumb.
Witness David Brooks, house broken "conservative" over at the New York Times. I actually like Brooks, when he remembers to stick with his light but amusing columns concerning the sociology of contemporary America. But here, as Steve Sailer puts it, he "goes beyond self-parody."
The schlock here is almost too thick to stand, but it will nonetheless receive a rebuttal.
First, immigration opponents are effectively trying to restrict the flow of conservatives into this country... In survey after survey, immigrants are found to have more traditional
ideas about family structure and community than comparable Americans... Immigrants go into poor neighborhoods and infuse them with traditional values.
Surveys are amazing things, but you know what's even more amazing? Empirical data.
"[U]nmarried immigrants are significantly more likely than unmarried natives to give birth... Hispanic immigrants have seen the largest increase in out-of-wedlock
births — from 19 percent of births in 1980 to 42 percent in 2003. This
is important because Hispanics account for nearly 60 percent of all
births to immigrants."
Oh so close, David.
This notion that lawbreakers from the south are exemplar conservatives is risible, and doesn't square with the electoral data. Sure, Hispanics tend to frown on buggery more than natives, but they still vote for the party of abortion and handouts.
Second, immigration opponents are trying to restrict assimilation.
Why, just think of Los Angeles, where a home crowd eagerly rooted for the U.S. soccer team against visiting Mexico. Wait, that didn't happen? Well, then, it's obviously the fault of those horrible natives for not helping immigrants assimilate.
If this was 1965, Brooks would still be wrong, but at least he would be guessing. We've had almost fifty years of substantial immigration from the third world, and the results aren't pretty. But it's so much easier just to speculate wildly, so we'll stick with that.
Third, immigration opponents are trying to restrict love affairs... an astonishing 26 percent of Hispanics and 28 percent of Asians married outside their groups.
This is certainly a new one. Presumably, without immigration, all of these people would have died alone. Tragic, really.
Fourth, immigration opponents are trying to restrict social mobility. Generation after generation, the children of immigrants are gradually
better educated and more affluent than their parents.
Wrong. As the last link above explains:
"In our book “Generations of Exclusion,” we show that the descendants of
Mexicans do not experience the steady progress into the third and fourth
generations that has been documented for those of European ancestry."
I guess Brooks doesn't read his own paper.
Moreover, American citizens are no longer seeing their own affluence increase from generation to generation. That's just not a high priority, though, what with all these magical people living in the shadows.
Fifth, immigration opponents are trying to restrict skills. Current
reform proposals would increase high-skill immigration. Opponents of
reform are trying to restrict an infusion of people most likely to start
businesses and invent things.
Apparently Mexico is a really stupid country. They keep kicking out these high-skilled entrepreneurs, but lucky for us, we get them all, and they go on to start all these businesses and... wait, they don't?
Actually, while Mexico has its share of problems, sloughing off its unemployed masses to its norther neighbor while refusing to let in any undesirables from the south is pretty good policy. Since it would be racist to implement Mexico's policy, we've really no choice but to send unemployed to Canada. Take that you hosers!
No one wants to restrict entrepreneurs, but it would be asking too much to let in a handful of bright immigrants without taking in millions of unskilled workers.
Our immigration policy makes us really dumb.