This week's column:
"The man being coerced, therefore, always loses in utility as a result of the intervention, for his action has been forcibly changed by its impact.” – Murray Rothbard, Man, Economy, and State
There are few things that are so misunderstood as the free market. The very term conjures up hobgoblins: from robber barons and Dickensian businessmen, to Gordon Gecko and Bernie Madoff.
Yet the free market is nothing more than a system of voluntary exchange. A producer offers a good or a service to consumers; in a primitive economy, the consumer offers a good or a service in return; later, some form of money—historically, it has usually been silver or gold—allows a single good to take the place of an endless series of bartered items. This allowed for greater specialization: rather than having to acquire the good the producer wants, consumers can exchange money with the understanding that the producer can then, as a consumer, offer this good in exchange with another producer. Money allows for greater specialization, but it does not alter the system as one of voluntary exchange.
Sunday, September 19, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment