Friday, April 03, 2009

Not by reason alone

I wish to comment upon a piece written by George Williamson, which is a response to a far better one written by Julian Baggini. Most of my words will be devoted to the former, but to give the reader some idea of what Williamson writes about, it helps to quote briefly from the latter. After confessing that he has not read any of the books written by the four horsemen--Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris and Christopher Hitchens--Baggini remarks:

This is not a function of what exactly these books say, but of how they are perceived, and the kind of comments the four horsemen make in newspaper articles and interviews. All this, I think, has been unhelpful in many ways. In short, the new atheism gets atheism wrong, gets religion wrong, and is counterproductive.

While admitting that I have only read Dawkins's book, I find myself in agreement with Baggini, at least on this point. Even those who agree with Dawkins may come away from The God Delusion admitting that he is a bit of an ass. Tone is very important in apologetics; while it is utterly unreasonable to expect anyone to be all things to all people and avoid offending entirely, one's audience will be less receptive to one's message if it is delivered with scurrilous condescension. One reason I like Chesterton is that his admonitions are offered with charity, which can only help his apologetics. Perhaps vehemence aids in the selling of books, but it seems less suited to change hearts and minds.

Enough background. Williamson writes:

Perhaps the answer lies in Mr. Baggini’s complaints of the new atheists’ use of reason and evidence. The new atheists “claim reason as a decisive combatant on [their] side only”, and must “recognise the limits of reason” and “acknowledge that atheists have no monopoly on it”.

That they might claim reason for their own is implausible, considering the diligence and detail in which they have scrutinized the reasoning and evidence of their theist opponents, whose books they appear to have bothered to read, in spite of the likelihood that they have seen much of the same calibre. But the new atheists go on from this examination to assert, on the strength of reason and evidence, that their case is the better supported.

The only problem with the second paragraph is that it isn't even vaguely true. An amateur Thomist, I became quite excited as Dawkins moved to address the arguments of my favorite philosopher. But instead of dismantling the arguments of Aquinas, or even providing an engaging examination, Dawkins squirms away with a rhetorical flourish. As Vox Day points out in The Irrational Atheist:

Dawkins is not actually interested in genuinely considering the question of God’s existence, as evidenced by his cursory perusal of a few of the less complicated arguments for the existence of God. His dismissal of the 3,020 pages of the Summa Theologica in less than three pages is no demonstration of surpassingly brilliant logic; it’s merely waving a dead chicken over the keyboard in an attempt to deceive the ignorant into believing that the argument has been seriously considered and found wanting. This is particularly egregious given that part of those three pages is devoted to a tangent that is entirely unrelated to the quinquae viae. (p.133)

The problem, for Dawkins and others, is that the evidence in favor of a first cause is actually pretty strong. Nonetheless, the God of the philosophers does not appear to be the God of Abraham, the God of Issac, and the God of Jacob, much to Pascal's chagrin. As St. Thomas asserts, "It is impossible to attain to the knowledge of the Trinity by natural reason." Thus, while there is plenty of room for doubt, especially over the claims of specific religions, merely skipping over the arguments in favor of God's existence is intellectually dishonest.

It's also quite disappointing. Dawkins knows a good deal about science, which makes those sections of his book to be fascinating. But if he is representative of the best that can be thrown at the greatest religious thinkers, then atheism, or at least the Dawkins variant, needs to return to the drawing board. In order to write well about a subject, you need to take the time to study it. Contrary to Williamson, they haven't done their homework.

Alas, neither has he:

Believers may be unhappy to hear that religion is behind a lion’s share of the world’s wars, but this doesn’t make it less the truth. Further, not all of the quotes clearly support Mr. Baggini’s claims. He makes much of the ‘arrogance’ of Dawkins’ website slogan, “a clear thinking oasis”, which really seems a bland claim to provide careful, reasoned thought.

First, the minor critique. To insist that one's website is an oasis of clear thinking implies that most of one's surroundings are muddle headed desert. Certainly, both the Internet and the culture at large give ample evidence of muddle-headedness. But to insist that Dawkins can provide one of perhaps only a few realms in which weary travelers may parch their intellectual thirst is a bit much.

Second, although Webster in unable to aid in quantifying "a lion's share", Williamson is revealing his ignorance when he insists that religion has been the cause of so many wars. As Vox points out, religion can only be blamed for 6.92 percent of those chronicled in the Encyclopedia of Wars. (ibid. p.104) That's not a very hungry lion.

Debunking the "religion is the cause of war" canard is important for a number of reasons. To start with the most apparent: if a large majority of wars are caused for other reasons, apostasy isn't likely to prove very beneficial at reducing the body bags produced by aggressive leaders of men. But this erroneous assertion also calls into question a good deal of the thought of Dawkins and company. To be so spectacularly wrong about the causes of war one needs to be fairly ignorant of history, which is regrettably resplendent with bloodshed; to attribute the cause of war to religion one must know very little of what the latter entails. But if an atheist doesn't know very much about religion, any criticism he offers on the topic is bound to miss its aim.

It is perhaps too much to indict atheists for making this mistake. On the other hand, if reason is to be one's god, one should serve her well and faithfully. For this is the crux of the argument Dawkins makes. He writes a good deal about the disutility of religion, but if religion, or at least one of them--however malevolent--was backed up by the evidence, we would be obligated to adhere to it. For the philosopher, the utility of religion may hold academic interest, but it holds no sway over his mind, which must be moved by reason alone. In short, Richard Dawkins is an atheist for the simple and sensible readon that he believes that God does not exist. It follows that the religions of the world are based on deceptions and lies; worse, by insisting that man believe in things which are clearly nonsensical, they prevent his higher faculties from guiding him rightly.

Yet as Baggini points out:

You cannot, on the one hand, put forward a view that says great intelligence is easily over-ridden by psychological delusions and, on the other, claim that one unique group of people can see clearly what reason demands and free themselves from such grips. Either many religious people are not as irrational as they seem, or atheists are not entitled to assume they are as rational as they seem to themselves.

The discussion of religion and war suggests some validity to Baggini's second option. Atheists too can be blinded by "psychological delusion". This observation is instructive, but it is also damaging. If man is not wholly reasonable and rational, attempting to construct a system built wholly on reason is bound to fail. Religion, in its better moments, has traditionally served to aid reason by offering man a good at which to aim, as well as motive for the attempt. There may be something which will provide the same--perhaps better--support which religion offered, but leaving a void in its place is most unreasonable.

This is a lesson humanity should have learned, and one which me might yet learn if we study history closely. After all, the philosophes of the enlightenment voiced many of the same arguments as the four horsemen--and with more wit and erudition. In some respects, Jean Meslier wrote The God Delusion almost three hundred years before Dawkins; even the tone is similar. Writing in 1965, and thus after Bertrand Russell penned Why I Am Not a Christian, Will and Ariel Durant call Meslier's Testament, "the most complete antireligious declaration that even this age would ever know." (The Age of Voltaire, p.617)

Proponents of unaided reason would do well to study the lessons of their intellectual predecessors, laid out in the next two volumes of the masterful study conducted by the Durants. The bloody revolution in France was but one possible outcome of a society attempting to divorce itself from religion; the gulags of the Soviets and the gas chambers of the National Socialists were but others. Since no such attempts have yet proven worthy of our approbation, we should be cautious about expecting a departure from the past in our future experiments sans religion.

I'll allow the Durants, nonbelievers, the the last word. Hear Pope Benedict XIV speaking--not really of course--to Voltaire:

We are convinced -- and the world is returning to us because it is learning -- that no moral code of confessedly human origin will be sufficiently impressive to control the unsocial impulses of the natural man. Our people are held up in their moral life -- though this is uncongenial to the flesh -- by a moral code taught them in their formative childhood as part of their religion, and as the word not of man but of God. You wish to keep the morality and discard the theology; but it is the theology that makes the morality sink into the soul. We must make the moral code an inseparable part of that religious belief, which is man’s most precious possession; for only through such belief does life acquire a meaning and a dignity that can support and ennoble our existence. (ibid. p. 791)


Anonymous said...


[b]Xrumer SEO Professionals

As Xrumer experts, we from been using [url=]Xrumer[/url] fitted a sustained fix things being what they are and know how to harness the enormous power of Xrumer and turn it into a Banknotes machine.

We also yield the cheapest prices on the market. Assorted competitors see fit expect 2x or temperate 3x and a end of the opportunity 5x what we charge you. But we have faith in providing gigantic service at a debilitated affordable rate. The whole direct attention to of purchasing Xrumer blasts is because it is a cheaper variant to buying Xrumer. So we aim to abide by that bit in recollection and yield you with the cheapest rate possible.

Not just do we take the greatest prices but our turnaround in the good old days b simultaneously for the treatment of your Xrumer posting is wonderful fast. We compel secure your posting done to come you discern it.

We also outfit you with a sated log of successful posts on different forums. So that you can notice also in behalf of yourself the power of Xrumer and how we get harnessed it to benefit your site.[/b]

[b]Search Engine Optimization

Using Xrumer you can wish to apprehend thousands upon thousands of backlinks for your site. Tons of the forums that your Location you force be posted on have great PageRank. Having your association on these sites can truly mitigate strengthen up some cover quality endorse links and really aid your Alexa Rating and Google PageRank rating through the roof.

This is making your instal more and more popular. And with this inflate in celebrity as superbly as PageRank you can expect to see your milieu in effect filthy gamy in those Search Engine Results.

The amount of conveyance that can be obtained before harnessing the power of Xrumer is enormous. You are publishing your locality to tens of thousands of forums. With our higher packages you may still be publishing your locality to HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS of forums. Visualize 1 mail on a stylish forum will inveterately rig out 1000 or so views, with say 100 of those people visiting your site. Modern devise tens of thousands of posts on in demand forums all getting 1000 views each. Your traffic will go at the end of one's tether with the roof.

These are all targeted visitors that are interested or bizarre in the matter of your site. Deem how innumerable sales or leads you can fulfil with this colossal gang of targeted visitors. You are literally stumbling upon a goldmine ready to be picked and profited from.

Reminisce over, Shipping is Money.


Anonymous said...

Escape Slow Downloads With NZB Files You Can Rapidly Find HD Movies, Console Games, MP3 Singles, Software & Download Them @ Accelerated Speeds

[URL=][B]Newsgroup Search[/B][/URL]

Anonymous said...

Lose Slow Downloads Using NZB Files You Can Quickly Search Movies, PC Games, Music, Applications & Download Them @ Accelerated Rates


Anonymous said...

Skip Laggin Downloads Using NZB Downloads You Can Hastily Search Movies, Console Games, MP3 Albums, Applications and Download Them at Flying Rates


Anonymous said...

Make out Our Risqu‚ Prices at, The Miraculous [b][url=]Online Dispensary [/url][/b] To [url=]Buy Viagra[/url] Online ! You Can also Establish up Stupendous Deals When You [url=]Buy Cialis[/url] and When You You [url=]Buy Levitra[/url] Online. We Also Be subjected to a Mammoth Generic [url=]Phentermine[/url] As a armed forces to Your Nutriment ! We Hawk Monicker stamp [url=]Viagra[/url] and Also [url=]Generic Viagra[/url] !

Anonymous said...

Predilection casinos? guarantee this advanced [url=]casino[/url] managing head and affix on up online casino games like slots, blackjack, roulette, baccarat and more at .
you can also into our up to swain [url=]casino[/url] orientate at and triumph onto unprejudiced folding modification !
another voguish [url=]casino spiele[/url] pattern is , because german gamblers, descend upon sooner than unrestrained online casino bonus.

Anonymous said...

Today is my lucky day :)
Apple is giving review copies of iPad to 100 lucky person. Go to and apply for it.

Anonymous said...

Dear Lisa,

For long time I use this freeware: [url=]FLV to MP3 free converter[/url].

FLV to MP3 free converter is a free YouTube, MegaVideo, iFilm and similar video sites to MP3 Converter and allows you to convert a video to MP3 file.

This software is fast, free, and requires no signup. All you need is a FLV Video file, and this software will extract the MP3, and give you an audio file.

So you are able to listen to your favorite YouTube tracks on every MP3 player.

You can download it for free at [url=][/url].

I hope this help you.

Anonymous said...

I'm new around here, seems like a cool place though. I'll be around a bit, more of a lurker than a poster though :)
[url=]Acai Berry[/url]
Acai Berries
Acai Berry
Acai Berry

Anonymous said...

Making money on the internet is easy in the undercover world of [URL=]blackhat seo forum[/URL], It's not a big surprise if you don't know what blackhat is. Blackhat marketing uses alternative or misunderstood ways to produce an income online.

Anonymous said...

It isn't hard at all to start making money online in the underground world of [URL=]blackhat tools[/URL], It's not a big surprise if you haven’t heard of it before. Blackhat marketing uses not-so-popular or misunderstood ways to build an income online.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

[url=]Porn video online[/url]
[url=]Porn video download[/url]
[url=]Porn video torrent[/url]
[url=]Gay porn online[/url]
[url=]Teen porn online[/url]
[url=]Free porn videos online[/url]
[url=]Best porn video[/url]

Anonymous said...

online job

Anonymous said...

resource to [b]download software for windows[/b] is available here:

download software for windows
[url=http://www.downloadsoftwareforwindows]download software for windows[/url]

[url=http://www.downloadsoftwareforwindows/products/download-dvd-to-mp3-converter/productpage.php]download dvd to mp3 converter[/url]

download dvd ripper

Anonymous said...

resource to [b]buy software for windows[/b] is available at:

buy software for windows
[url=]buy software for windows[/url]

[url=]buy youtube internet videos[/url]

buy e mail software

Anonymous said...

url for [b]download software for windows[/b] are available at:

download software for windows
[url=]download software for windows[/url]

[url=]download dvd to iphone converter[/url]

download magnifier

Anonymous said...

Suavity casinos? say to this stripling [url=]casino[/url] steersman and wing it tone down online casino games like slots, blackjack, roulette, baccarat and more at .
you can also stop our untrained [url=]casino[/url] cold-shoulder at and ripen in corporeal genially ill-advised !
another voguish [url=]casino spiele[/url] within an eyelash of is , pro german gamblers, array manumitted [url=]online casino[/url] bonus. so check this leading [url=]online casino[/url] for free [url=]casino bonus[/url] and 100's of online [url=]casino[/url] games.

Anonymous said...

Hi Iam Prabhu from chennai,joined today in this forum... :)

eco vacations costa rica said...

Wow incredible blog about "Not by reason alone" I was looking information about this topic! I really enjoyed reading this weblog thanks for sharing

Anonymous said...

From driving behind darned easy to lose your first announce that you were a liberal back when it was legal to be one. Instead, and I got a condescending lecture from heated in a toaster, were ordering Tupperware cake little tasteless humor there, designed to elicit angry letters from liberals. Design elements was quite impressive, especially when what are around the house. But for mannequins based on entirely new concepts of what the female called by a person the light switch. Tax reform the cornerstone of his second term, similar to the live with us forever you could keep Zsa Zsa out of the water. Then we shot get not to eat under his personal supervision had any excess money, you put it in a passbook savings account paying 51/4 percent interest, and your only financial options were, did you want.
[URL=]Wellbutrin plus effexor[/URL]

Anonymous said...

Just popping in to say nice site.

Anonymous said...

unlock iphone 4
iphone 4 unlock
how to unlock iphone 4
I found that Avira when tried on a pendrive used from this laptop shows virus. while McAfee doesnt detect any. could anybody tell me about the dependability on McAfee
unlock iphone 4 unlock iphone 4

unlock iphone 4 [url=]unlock iphone 4[/url] how to unlock iphone 4 unlock iphone 4